“Humanity follows the Earth, the Earth follows Heaven, Heaven follows the Dao, and the Dao follows what is natural.” Dao De Jing
Friday, October 27, 2006
Love for all
Ah yes, the blessed words of love. God loves everyone, so I love everyone. Everyone should love everyone. How wonderful those words sound. How inspiring to the ear, yet so hollow in practice. I love all people, except for those who don't love as I do. It is the same as the naive and shallow excuse for tolerance that is so frequently spewed out these days - I tolerate everyone, except for those who don't tolerate everyone. Well, it is not admitted so, but in practice it is very much so. Christians have long been villanized by such nonsense, and in their own turn, victimize others in much the same way. Tit for tat, I suppose. But a damn shame either way. We are so quick to love those who agree with us - and even faster to villanize those who don't. Ah, the sweet smell of self-righteousness. How it warms the hearts of the faithful of each opposing camp. Staring back at each other across the verbal (and too often physical) battlefield, smug in our ignorant and proud 'love!' Ah, where oh where is love - god is love - how I despair, for my hope is proved false, my salvation an empty dream.
If Christians Would Be Christ-like
If christians would only be christ-like, then the world would see the truth of the gospel. That's just the problem, though, isn't it. Far too few christians are christ-like, few display evidence in their lives of the radical transformation and renewal that the gospel promises. The average christian is, at best, average. The world is still waiting for christians to display the evidence of the gospel in their lives - waiting for christians to love one another, to love their enemies, to trust in god, to exhibit the famous fruit of salvation. And the world still waits. Of course, there are those few that really demonstrate a deep love and, can I say, holiness. Those are, sadly, too few, and no more than what can be found in other communities of different faiths. There are deeply loving buddhists, hindus, Muslims, mormons, wiccans, and even atheists - how can so few exemplary christians constitute evidence in favor of the gospel? Jesus himself said, "A new commandment I give unto you, That ye love one another; as I have loved you, that ye also love one another. By this shall all men know that ye are my disciples, if ye have love one to another." Joh 13:34-35
I would wish, and had cherished the hope for years, that christianity would prove true. However, it is sadly as Gandhi explained - "I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ."
I would wish, and had cherished the hope for years, that christianity would prove true. However, it is sadly as Gandhi explained - "I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ."
Wednesday, October 25, 2006
No More Than This
Years before it was considered a dirty word, fundamentalism actually meant a return to the fundamentals of christian faith (as perceived by some). It was an attempt to move away from the ugliness of excessive dogmatics and denominational in-fighting. The idea was to return to the purest expression of christian faith possible. The maze of doctrine was paired down to a digestible chunk. However, as history has demonstrated, the chunk was still too big. It did not take long before fundamentalists were mired once again into dogmatic battles, and indeed have developed a rather infamous reputation for doctrinal disputes.
Was the problem that they went to far, or that they did not go far enough in trying to find the core of theological understanding? Ironically in this case less is more - but not in a good way! I believe that the fundamentalist had the right idea, that doctrinal confusion or dogmatism does little to benefit church nor society. I don't believe that they went far enough.
Every religion has to its credit a plethora of doctrines and theories of varying complexity. In every faith the issues of sin and death are wrestled with, and invariably a doctrine or theory of salvation is proposed - and then fought over. Invariably the communities fighting to declare that they have the true understanding of and answers for life fail to live up to their own hype. Theories and rationalizations follow, and thus begins the inevitable doctrinal wars and battles.
Perhaps the reality is that no religion really has the answers. Maybe what they have are workable theories, much like scientific theories, that answer many questions, not all, and are destined to be replaced by newer theories tomorrow. Perhaps all of these doctrinal theories are deliberately complex - a Freudian illusion to hide the truth - the truth that we have failed, and continue to fail, to live up to our highest ideals. After all, what is the point of all these religious theories but to explain why we failed, and more importantly, what it is that we failed at. Inevitably, in every faith, the problem is that we have failed morally. Was the gospel proclaimed to convince the world of the trinity, or convict of sin and save people from said sin - namely, to make people righteous (today, or in the eternal estate). A maze of doctrines was eventually formed to explain and excuse mans continual failure. When pressed about the fundamentals of the law (and faith), Jesus nailed it down (literally):
Master, which is the great commandment in the law?
Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart,
and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind.
This is the first and great commandment.
And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.
On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.
Mat 22:36-40
Therein lies the true fundamentals - all other doctrinal theories revolve and are subservient to it. This is practically manifested by the Golden Rule. And Jesus was not alone in this. This core, this fundamental understanding, is represented by most, if not all, of the worlds great religions. Perhaps, just perhaps, we need no more than this.
Was the problem that they went to far, or that they did not go far enough in trying to find the core of theological understanding? Ironically in this case less is more - but not in a good way! I believe that the fundamentalist had the right idea, that doctrinal confusion or dogmatism does little to benefit church nor society. I don't believe that they went far enough.
Every religion has to its credit a plethora of doctrines and theories of varying complexity. In every faith the issues of sin and death are wrestled with, and invariably a doctrine or theory of salvation is proposed - and then fought over. Invariably the communities fighting to declare that they have the true understanding of and answers for life fail to live up to their own hype. Theories and rationalizations follow, and thus begins the inevitable doctrinal wars and battles.
Perhaps the reality is that no religion really has the answers. Maybe what they have are workable theories, much like scientific theories, that answer many questions, not all, and are destined to be replaced by newer theories tomorrow. Perhaps all of these doctrinal theories are deliberately complex - a Freudian illusion to hide the truth - the truth that we have failed, and continue to fail, to live up to our highest ideals. After all, what is the point of all these religious theories but to explain why we failed, and more importantly, what it is that we failed at. Inevitably, in every faith, the problem is that we have failed morally. Was the gospel proclaimed to convince the world of the trinity, or convict of sin and save people from said sin - namely, to make people righteous (today, or in the eternal estate). A maze of doctrines was eventually formed to explain and excuse mans continual failure. When pressed about the fundamentals of the law (and faith), Jesus nailed it down (literally):
Master, which is the great commandment in the law?
Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart,
and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind.
This is the first and great commandment.
And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.
On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.
Mat 22:36-40
Therein lies the true fundamentals - all other doctrinal theories revolve and are subservient to it. This is practically manifested by the Golden Rule. And Jesus was not alone in this. This core, this fundamental understanding, is represented by most, if not all, of the worlds great religions. Perhaps, just perhaps, we need no more than this.
Sunday, October 22, 2006
On a Path
I am following a path, albeit the path is not clear or easy to see. Really, there are times I am not sure I am still on a path. I still press on, sometimes with great focus and conviction, other times I'm wandering casually along. Presently, I am wandering - with no clear direction or even purpose. My only purpose is to know.
I'm hoping that with this blog I will encounter others also following a path, perhaps even my path, perhaps not. I believe everyone is on a journey, but that some are more clear about it than others. I want to meet people who are engaged with their faith journey, in their various stages.
My own journey has taken me from atheism to deep christian faith, to agnosticism. I have come to accept that I am post-christian, but still have a nagging, lingering hope that that is not true. I have read in the writings/challenges of Freethinkers to Christians that there are no examples of ex-christians who, having really examining the evidence and renouncing their faith, have later returned to their christian faith. Can anyone relate or respond to this challenge? I have a sincere respect for, and interest in Buddhism and Taoism - but I do not feel any real desire to convert. I appreciate their wisdom and am interested in their theories.
I want to enter into dialogue with others (not arguments, but dialogue). I want to learn from your experience, your perspective. I may not agree, perhaps I will. But I want to hear from you.
I'm hoping that with this blog I will encounter others also following a path, perhaps even my path, perhaps not. I believe everyone is on a journey, but that some are more clear about it than others. I want to meet people who are engaged with their faith journey, in their various stages.
My own journey has taken me from atheism to deep christian faith, to agnosticism. I have come to accept that I am post-christian, but still have a nagging, lingering hope that that is not true. I have read in the writings/challenges of Freethinkers to Christians that there are no examples of ex-christians who, having really examining the evidence and renouncing their faith, have later returned to their christian faith. Can anyone relate or respond to this challenge? I have a sincere respect for, and interest in Buddhism and Taoism - but I do not feel any real desire to convert. I appreciate their wisdom and am interested in their theories.
I want to enter into dialogue with others (not arguments, but dialogue). I want to learn from your experience, your perspective. I may not agree, perhaps I will. But I want to hear from you.
Friday, October 20, 2006
Know Thy Self
What do I feel? Anxious? My mind tells me that all is well. I realize that as things stand, things are pretty good. Nothing really to worry about. I know that that which causes me to be anxious, is mostly illusion. The worst will not be that bad, and in any case it will pass. This my mind tells me. This I can say I know. Yet I still have a lingering feeling of anxiety. It is absolutely fascinating. My mind is in one state, but my body is in another. I know what it is that is causing me anxiety, and I know why it should not. My thoughts are peaceful and clear, but my body is stressed. My mind knows that all is well and that all will be well - I just don't know how to make my body believe it. Absolutely fascinating!
Sunday, October 15, 2006
Genie in the bottle
Sometimes I wish I could put the genie back into the bottle. I'm sure the biblical Adam and Eve probably felt the same way after they bit the proverbial apple. With their newfound awareness I'm sure the wrestled with a mix of excitement, fear, guilt, and wonder. Everything they had previously believed and understood must have seemed different all of a sudden. Perhaps they had to try to understand if they had been lied too. When your world is suddenly changed, who do you trust? Where do you turn to for direction and help? Even if they didn't feel lied to, could they still relate to their environment the same way? To God or to each other? Surely they had wished they could put the genie back into the bottle.
It is frustrating to have to re-visit questions that I had thought to have answered - who am I? what is my purpose? what is the truth behind life? But perhaps things are not any less than they need to be. I have a hunch that in the genesis story, God was deliberate in putting the forbidden fruit within reach of Adam and Eve. If he really didn't want them to eat it, he could have put it thousands of miles away from them, far from their reach. Or, he could have explained things a little better so that they could have made an informed decision. What's the point of telling them they would die, if they had no way of understanding what that meant? I think god intended to let the genie out of the bottle.
I think the purpose of the tree was to educate them through experience. Did Adam and Eve create sin and death? No. Did they created 'disobedience'? No. They learned about these things through experience. Indeed, I doubt that there would be anything really special about the fruit itself. It was the act, the choice, to take and eat the fruit that brought about knowledge of good and evil. It did not create good and evil, it brought about the knowledge, experientially gained, of good and evil. Rubbing the bottle did not create the genie, it only let it free. Once the genie is out, choices must be made.
I feel a bit like Adam and Eve. My understanding of God and therefore life have changed. I'm left looking around for answers, wrestling with questions once thought answered. But I am moving past regret into acceptance. The genie is out, that I cannot change. I can't pretend to see things the way I once did. Like Adam I must come to terms with my newfound understanding, however imperfect it still is. Only, I have no one to blame but myself. Perhaps God wanted them to eat of the forbidden fruit, or at least make choices in light of its existence. Maybe it was just a case of timing? Maybe they ate too soon? I couldn't say. But as the story goes, they ate, the saw, and the genie was set free.
It is frustrating to have to re-visit questions that I had thought to have answered - who am I? what is my purpose? what is the truth behind life? But perhaps things are not any less than they need to be. I have a hunch that in the genesis story, God was deliberate in putting the forbidden fruit within reach of Adam and Eve. If he really didn't want them to eat it, he could have put it thousands of miles away from them, far from their reach. Or, he could have explained things a little better so that they could have made an informed decision. What's the point of telling them they would die, if they had no way of understanding what that meant? I think god intended to let the genie out of the bottle.
I think the purpose of the tree was to educate them through experience. Did Adam and Eve create sin and death? No. Did they created 'disobedience'? No. They learned about these things through experience. Indeed, I doubt that there would be anything really special about the fruit itself. It was the act, the choice, to take and eat the fruit that brought about knowledge of good and evil. It did not create good and evil, it brought about the knowledge, experientially gained, of good and evil. Rubbing the bottle did not create the genie, it only let it free. Once the genie is out, choices must be made.
I feel a bit like Adam and Eve. My understanding of God and therefore life have changed. I'm left looking around for answers, wrestling with questions once thought answered. But I am moving past regret into acceptance. The genie is out, that I cannot change. I can't pretend to see things the way I once did. Like Adam I must come to terms with my newfound understanding, however imperfect it still is. Only, I have no one to blame but myself. Perhaps God wanted them to eat of the forbidden fruit, or at least make choices in light of its existence. Maybe it was just a case of timing? Maybe they ate too soon? I couldn't say. But as the story goes, they ate, the saw, and the genie was set free.
Thursday, October 12, 2006
Well, I just returned from another visit under the knife. Okay, so it wasn't anything serious - I had my last screw removed ... from my ankle. If you ever want to experience your own mortality and the feeling of vulnerability, then break a leg. Or in my case, an ankle and a leg. It is a tough pill to swallow. Still, the pill must go down, the lessons must be learned (whatever they are), and life will go on, with or in spite of me. It has been a year since I did the damage, and this was the last bit of hardware to come out. I have not recovered full mobility in my ankle, and I believe the screw was the cause. Just hours after surgery, and already my ankle feels looser, more mobile. It seems that artificial is not always best. Indeed, I believe that natural is more often better. Things just flow better if they are natural - the way they are meant to be without being forced. When we fill our lives with artificial supports it often means we are missing something or that something is wrong. I had my screw removed because it was interfering with my natural movements. A screw was put into my ankle because something was wrong. It had no business being there before I broke my ankle, and it has no business being there now that the problem has been fixed. It was a temporary support until the natural movement was restored. It's purpose has been served, and so it has been removed. To hold onto the artificial support beyond its intended use would only cause me to limp when I should be running.
Wednesday, October 11, 2006
I was driving home from work today, and I was thinking about getting a new cell phone. My cell phone is not broken, but it is a couple years old and it has been well used. I am wrestling with being locked into a contract again, which I really don't like. As I was thinking about this and driving, I was weighing the pros and cons of having a cell phone. How did we get by without them for so many years?! The thought came to me, "what happens if my car breaks down." It was at this point that I realized that in our busy lives, we don't even have time to wait on a broken car. We don't want anything to slow down, or get in the way of, our busy pace. On the other hand, we are too often too busy, in too much of a hurry to help someone else stuck on the road? We want instant coffee and instant fixes. Granted, I can see the value in having speedy help on the highway, but that seems to me a symptom of a larger trend. We want what we want fast. It doesn't matter what it is. Health, wealth, happiness, we don't want to wait. It made me wonder again about what it is we are racing after...why are we in such a hurry? How much of life are we missing simply because we are racing through it?
Tuesday, October 10, 2006
Busy
There was a time when life seemed so busy...nearly every minute was accounted for, and those that weren't were quickly swept along in the tide. At times life was full and satisfying, and at others it was damn exhausting. So I moved. A new town, a new job, a fresh start. The immediate quiet was pure bliss. To here the sweet sound of silence. No more exhausting schedule, no longer where dozens of things competing for my time and attention. It was time to relax, focus on my own life, on my own family. It's funny how time can creep by, and suddenly years have passed. The new town is okay, nice, but not spectacular. It is the peace and quiet that makes it special. I now have time to relax - but I don't seem to do much more than that. Sure, I'm busy with family and work is still work. Now, if I am busy, it is doing family things. Mostly enjoyable, and usually avoidable if it is not. It is almost as if balance is being struck. I run the risk of enjoying relaxing too much, but there is just enough for me to do that I am staying clear of the evils of laziness....well, mostly clear. I guess the biggest downfall is that I watch too much TV now. For years I didn't even have cable, now I fall into the couch, and no sooner than I have landed the remote control for the TV is in my hands. Still, compared to the hectic business I had come from, this is nice. If things are crashing upon you, and you are struggling to find time to breath....I heartily recommend a change, a break from your routine. True, not everyone can move to another town, not everyone would want to. But often there is some refuge you can take - somewhere that takes you away from the stress and restores your sense of peace. Never neglect that place. It will restore you, and enable you to face the burdens, and perhaps give you a chance for clear reflection that will show you what burdens are best put down.
Monday, October 09, 2006
Sunday, October 08, 2006
Journey
Years I ago I was set upon a Journey of discovery. Discovery of who I am, a discovery of life. Whether I began this journey on my own, or if I was driven to it, I don't know. My Journey is driven by a deeply rooted desire to understand - and for me understanding is derived through questioning. The challenge at times is to ask the right questions.
My Journey has led me from loneliness and pain, through deep and powerful faith to skepticism - and it has affected every aspect of my life. I have not arrived at the end of my Journey - it seems beyond me. But I do not think I am alone. I am surrounded by others finding their way along their own Journey, and occasionally we may cross one anothers path.
My Journey has led me from loneliness and pain, through deep and powerful faith to skepticism - and it has affected every aspect of my life. I have not arrived at the end of my Journey - it seems beyond me. But I do not think I am alone. I am surrounded by others finding their way along their own Journey, and occasionally we may cross one anothers path.
Venting
Well, I'm glad I got that off of my chest. I'm not really sure what led me to rant about gods failure, and looking back at it I'm a bit embarrassed that I would do so. Really, if there is no god, he has done me no wrong, so why blast him so? If there is a god, then maybe it is just a case of my short-sightedness. Who knows? Still, to anyone who may be offended by it, my apologies. I don't recant what I said, but I apologize for the apparent meaninglessness of saying it. I guess I am just venting with the hope that someone can show me that I am wrong. I am finding more and more that I am the true "double-minded man." I want to engage in dialogue about these issues, to wrestle with them, but at the same time I am sick of wresting with it, tired of reading about it.
I wish that in my journey I could shrug off yesterday, embrace today, and greet tomorrow, tomorrow. But the reality is that I am still hindered by yesterday, or formed may be more precise. I am shaped and molded by the past. My response to the present is limited and not entirely free. And because I am simultaneously holding on to the past and looking to the future, I am not entirely in the present. I am without foundation, drifting without knowing where I am going, or why. I am in some ways lost, although at times I am quite content with that. If I have arrived at this point through honest searching, then I need to be content with that. But I have come to a point in my search wherein I have nothing to search for but clarity and contentment - and I'm not sure where to find them. Do I find contentment in a higher cause/principle/god? Or can I find contentment in non-attachment, freedom from the hindrances of desire and self? In my double-minded way, both options sing to me, draw me - yet equally I fall short of contentment in either direction. What I need is to go beyond intellectualized to practice and experience. But what do I practice? I want to practice living - really living. But how is that defined? God-centered or god-less? If god, which god? If no god, then what? I hesitate to live fully, because I fear to be wrong. I am painfully aware that I know so little. I am living only a partial life. I am a specter, a hollow man. I long to be filled with true vitality, yet I do not live in the small ways I believe I should. How can I hope for more when I do not live the half-life I have?
I wish that in my journey I could shrug off yesterday, embrace today, and greet tomorrow, tomorrow. But the reality is that I am still hindered by yesterday, or formed may be more precise. I am shaped and molded by the past. My response to the present is limited and not entirely free. And because I am simultaneously holding on to the past and looking to the future, I am not entirely in the present. I am without foundation, drifting without knowing where I am going, or why. I am in some ways lost, although at times I am quite content with that. If I have arrived at this point through honest searching, then I need to be content with that. But I have come to a point in my search wherein I have nothing to search for but clarity and contentment - and I'm not sure where to find them. Do I find contentment in a higher cause/principle/god? Or can I find contentment in non-attachment, freedom from the hindrances of desire and self? In my double-minded way, both options sing to me, draw me - yet equally I fall short of contentment in either direction. What I need is to go beyond intellectualized to practice and experience. But what do I practice? I want to practice living - really living. But how is that defined? God-centered or god-less? If god, which god? If no god, then what? I hesitate to live fully, because I fear to be wrong. I am painfully aware that I know so little. I am living only a partial life. I am a specter, a hollow man. I long to be filled with true vitality, yet I do not live in the small ways I believe I should. How can I hope for more when I do not live the half-life I have?
Friday, October 06, 2006
The failure of God
Just. Righteous. Good. Loving. These are just some of the descriptors used of the christian god, and I imagine that those of other faiths would give a nod of recognition that they could easily be used to describe their gods. But do any of those words speak to the experience of all people, in all places?
Just. Even the prophets of old despaired that there is no justice in the world. The wicked prosper, and the righteous are trampled down.
Righteous. Can this be measured by our experience or knowledge? Job offered a challenge to god, full of faith that god would and could meet that challenge - and what did he discover? That god mocked his mortality, his finite understanding. God demanded Job to reach beyond his nature, beyond the nature that god himself had supposedly created, and mocked Job further when he could not. God thrust his might and power, his awesome greatness before Job. God in essence terrified Job with his indignation. It is no surprise that Job, already broken by his suffering, recanted his challenge ( a challenge offered in faith and hope) and submitted to gods obvious greatness. Righteousness? I am not convinced.
Good. The suffering of millions cries out to be heard, to be relieved. The silence of god is deafening. The relief of suffering is withheld. Starvation, war, disease, rape, murder, slavery .... these are not things from a distant past, but the terrible reality that faces millions of men, women, and children every day, every year. Is humanity not responsible for its own sins...yes and no. Yes and no. There is indeed much guilt in human history, but there are also many, many victims. Are those unable to heal themselves, to "save themselves," to be held responsible for their suffering and demise? Shall the child born with aids be blamed for his suffering? What of the mighty and strong that withhold help, withhold healing? What of a god that is proclaimed to be compassionate, loving, and good? Where is his healing hand? Does the suffering of a lonely prophet thousands of years ago atone for the millions of lives destroyed and maimed throughout history?
Loving. Ah, love. True love is truly sweet, very powerful. How is this known? Because of the sweet vitality of the imperfect love offered and experienced in human relations. And here lies the key. Love, to have value - to have meaning, must be experienced. To talk of love will fill the imagination, but unless it touches one in the realm of experience it will only be an empty sound, a hollow promise - empty of all true power. The gospel is full of talk of love. Of gods love. It is a message of love sent over time, thousands of years ago. But how far from our daily experience this love can be. I told you I love you once (thousands of years ago), and if I change my mind I will let you know. Is this the love of god? God loves me. Why do I have cancer? Well let me guess, maybe he is teaching me. Maybe I sinned. Maybe, maybe, maybe. I must guess because god will not tell. His love is silent.
How many souls have cried out to the Just, Righteous, Good, Loving god, only to be answered with silence. Is this the whole story of god? A word here and there scattered over the centuries, delivered to a privileged, secluded few? Perhaps there is more, but how can we know? We are but dust and so far have not been able to find the answers.
Just. Even the prophets of old despaired that there is no justice in the world. The wicked prosper, and the righteous are trampled down.
Righteous. Can this be measured by our experience or knowledge? Job offered a challenge to god, full of faith that god would and could meet that challenge - and what did he discover? That god mocked his mortality, his finite understanding. God demanded Job to reach beyond his nature, beyond the nature that god himself had supposedly created, and mocked Job further when he could not. God thrust his might and power, his awesome greatness before Job. God in essence terrified Job with his indignation. It is no surprise that Job, already broken by his suffering, recanted his challenge ( a challenge offered in faith and hope) and submitted to gods obvious greatness. Righteousness? I am not convinced.
Good. The suffering of millions cries out to be heard, to be relieved. The silence of god is deafening. The relief of suffering is withheld. Starvation, war, disease, rape, murder, slavery .... these are not things from a distant past, but the terrible reality that faces millions of men, women, and children every day, every year. Is humanity not responsible for its own sins...yes and no. Yes and no. There is indeed much guilt in human history, but there are also many, many victims. Are those unable to heal themselves, to "save themselves," to be held responsible for their suffering and demise? Shall the child born with aids be blamed for his suffering? What of the mighty and strong that withhold help, withhold healing? What of a god that is proclaimed to be compassionate, loving, and good? Where is his healing hand? Does the suffering of a lonely prophet thousands of years ago atone for the millions of lives destroyed and maimed throughout history?
Loving. Ah, love. True love is truly sweet, very powerful. How is this known? Because of the sweet vitality of the imperfect love offered and experienced in human relations. And here lies the key. Love, to have value - to have meaning, must be experienced. To talk of love will fill the imagination, but unless it touches one in the realm of experience it will only be an empty sound, a hollow promise - empty of all true power. The gospel is full of talk of love. Of gods love. It is a message of love sent over time, thousands of years ago. But how far from our daily experience this love can be. I told you I love you once (thousands of years ago), and if I change my mind I will let you know. Is this the love of god? God loves me. Why do I have cancer? Well let me guess, maybe he is teaching me. Maybe I sinned. Maybe, maybe, maybe. I must guess because god will not tell. His love is silent.
How many souls have cried out to the Just, Righteous, Good, Loving god, only to be answered with silence. Is this the whole story of god? A word here and there scattered over the centuries, delivered to a privileged, secluded few? Perhaps there is more, but how can we know? We are but dust and so far have not been able to find the answers.
Thursday, October 05, 2006
Journey
When does a journey begin? Does it begin at conception, before we even take our first independent breath? Or is the beginning of our journey an act of our will - does it begin with our own conscious decision: the willful first step taken in a thousand mile journey? Is my journey, any journey, truly autonomous and independent? Or are we confined by cause and effect, directed by a myriad of unseen decisions and events? It seems to me that I have choice within these confines, but I can't escape the consequences of those choices. Not only of my choices, but of those who have made choices that affect me, directly or indirectly. Even something as beyond me as the weather has significant involvment in my journey. My journey is clearly not only mine, alone. It is a journey in community with all existence, with all that is.
Wednesday, October 04, 2006
It is funny to think about how near-sighted we can be. Or perhaps it's just me. As a child, I could not believe in god, or at least in a god of love. Yet, in my late teens, I converted to Christianity, passionately convinced that there was indeed a god, and that that god had made himself and his love known to humanity. All of my doubts were answered - I was full of faith. I was absolutely certain that, no matter what happened, regardless of experience or gnosis, I would not, could not, doubt the truth of the Christian message. I was so certain. I committed all of my resources, everything that I was towards serving god. Everything that I was, and everything that I had hoped to be was surrendered to gods will. Year after year I committed myself to the divine, to understanding everything in the light of gods love and truth.
And yet, here I am, over a decade later, and all of my faith has fled. Looking back at my faith journey (and it has been, and still is, a journey) I can only marvel, not at my zealous faith, but at my present lack of faith. Having once believed, I cannot see how I can ever believe again. There was a time that I could not do anything but believe .... yet now, try as I might, I cannot believe. I can look back at the process, the journey from unbelief to belief back to unbelief - but I cannot relive those feelings/experiences of faith. I can only feel me now. Sure, I can still recover glimpses of what I once felt, but they are fleeting illusions, memories only that are ghostly in their intangibleness. Shades of yesterday that cannot touch the present. The journey was at times sweet, and recently full of sorrow and frustration - but I have found that I can only believe what I believe. And I can no longer remain in intimate communion with what I no longer believe. I cannot enter into the experience of yesterday. I am trapped by the present. Who knows what I will believe tomorrow - will I still find that there can be no other way?
And yet, here I am, over a decade later, and all of my faith has fled. Looking back at my faith journey (and it has been, and still is, a journey) I can only marvel, not at my zealous faith, but at my present lack of faith. Having once believed, I cannot see how I can ever believe again. There was a time that I could not do anything but believe .... yet now, try as I might, I cannot believe. I can look back at the process, the journey from unbelief to belief back to unbelief - but I cannot relive those feelings/experiences of faith. I can only feel me now. Sure, I can still recover glimpses of what I once felt, but they are fleeting illusions, memories only that are ghostly in their intangibleness. Shades of yesterday that cannot touch the present. The journey was at times sweet, and recently full of sorrow and frustration - but I have found that I can only believe what I believe. And I can no longer remain in intimate communion with what I no longer believe. I cannot enter into the experience of yesterday. I am trapped by the present. Who knows what I will believe tomorrow - will I still find that there can be no other way?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)